ROUND 3 Wests Tigers Vs Brisbane Broncos

Discussion in 'Matches' started by Magic, Mar 23, 2018.

  1. Wilson SB Wilson

    Lock that one in a gob.
     
  2. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    I don't need one. Just because the NRL operates by some flawed system in which on-field decisions take precedence over common sense probability doesn't mean I have to.

    As Tart said, it is not possible for him to touch the ball in that situation and it not be a try. He grazed the ball with his fingers, he had downward pressure. It's a try.
     
  3. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    Oh I see. So because they got previous calls wrong, which I never denied, that means the penalty is even less correct, does it?

    Good. Good stuff.
     
  4. Wilson SB Wilson

    Ah yes so now you can dispute the rule book.
     
  5. Wilson SB Wilson

    Quite right. It further proves the referees decided the game. As much as you and your fellow bong heads want to carry on about the Jack Bird finger bang.
     
  6. Magic AJ Parker

    [​IMG]

    One is, one isn't?

    Are we supposed to believe that Klein 'just missed' Boyd being offside or was it just conveniently easier to misplace his balls on that occasion because the drop goal went over?
     
  7. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    lol it's football, you spastic. They make errors all the time that decide the outcome of matches, change momentum, cause disadvantage to one team or another. You're only getting a sandy vag now because this penalty directly resulted in the end of the match. Bird scored and it should've been 8-2, possibly 10-2. That incorrect call resulted in a 7 tackle set and the Tigers going straight down the other end and scoring the only try of the match.
     
  8. Wilson SB Wilson

    Wasn't incorrect. Correct call was made. Lay off the peace pipe bruv.
     
  9. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    Yeah I mean we'll take an unconvinced and unsure touchie's opinion as definitive. lol
     
  10. Tartmaster AJ James

    Definitive angle of what?
    His hand is moving down,

    Either he touches it and it’s a try, or he doesn’t touch it.
    Unless his hand is moving sideways, there’s no way that can be a knock on.
     
  11. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    Same as Wilson's twitter nonsense. What is the point of posting pictures of the ball in the dummy-half's hands? That is not when they defence is first permitted to move.

    It's not remotely clear to me that Boyd is offside. And perhaps Klein didn't see it that way either. In fact I think adjusting for the angle it's reasonably clear that Boyd is onside here. The ball is partially seen at Godinet's feet here which means it has cleared the ruck. McCullough is comparable to Rochow, not Boyd ffs.

    https://imgur.com/J1QxB4b
     
  12. Wilson SB Wilson

    Okay, then show me that angle.
     
  13. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    Yeah having freeze framed it several times at different split fractions of a second, there's no way Boyd is offside on Brook's field goal.
     
  14. Wilson SB Wilson

    Hahaha mate you've taken 20 minutes to work up that weak response. Go to bed.
     
  15. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    lol what a fucking goose.
     
  16. Tartmaster AJ James

    Of fucking what cunt?

    Simple question, did he touch the ball?
     
  17. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    You should probably learn what constitutes a try before worrying about refereeing consistency.
     
  18. Wilson SB Wilson

    Gobble gobble.
     
  19. Wilson SB Wilson

    Show me the instance any part of his hand is on the ball with the ball on the ground.
     
  20. Wilson SB Wilson

    Simple question, are you stupid?

    Simple answer, yes.
     

Share This Page