Can we still get it changed to cricsim test watch or something, cause that is effectively what it is.
1. GJ Weaver (Vipers) - Only took one wicket in the match, but one could forgive him after his worth with the willow. How does that work, you are ranking him purely on his bowling performance, not on his batting and bowling combined aren't you?
If you don't like it you can fuck off. This is what I'm doing, and I'll do it my way. I don't need you telling me what to do when you do fuck all yourself. If you want to put SSD Dong in your team of the season after his round 1 performance that's cool, but I don't think he'll be there after R18 - nor what I pick him if I wanted to win tomorrow - which is what this is about. If you read the OP it says when players have played a couple of game and we can get a better read of them the rankings will have more changes.
It's just a comment on his game in general. He's still rated number 1 because he's still the best bowler in the BS.
The people have spoken, your idea is shit. Instead of getting grumpy you could have listened and changed it, instead you're too far deep now to admit i'm right so you'll spend the rest of the season doing this shithouse list, so good luck with wasting your time.
There will be one based on actual performances throughout the season so I don't think there will be a problem
It will be interesting to see how you judge each of our performance through the season. The way i see it is, if i don't get wickets Weaver and Welker does and vice-versa for them. But if no of us get wickets, we lose horribly and Blunder/Torres/Verigotta have a career game with the ball
Team of the season will change each week and half way through the season half of you will have no idea who'd make a team of the season. This will hopefully allow people to have an idea of that when we have enough samples to accurately rank them.
I think most of the confusion is you calling your eleven the Team of the Season, when it's not. I really like the concept of this in general, but I think that title is a bit off. "CricSim Herald Power XI" or something, perhaps?
I've thrown predicted in there for those who don't bother to read the OP. EDIT: I actually don't mind Power XI though, might run with that.
Right now? Basically the best, using form as a tie-breaker due to limited samples. By the end it'll be form, using prior seasons are a tie-breaker essentially. As the season goes on and we get more and more matches to judge people on the rankings will take on a more recent look.